Give Feedback
HomeTechnologyInternet

Rapidshare Fined $34 Million By Regional Court, Hamburg

Rapidshare is one of the world's largest file-hosting sites with millions of files stored on its servers. Rapidshare is a one click hosting provides paid and free services, owned by German and running from Switzerland. The Regional Court of Hamburg has ruled in favor of German collecting society GEMA, which had requested that the court issue an order prohibiting file-hosting service rapidshare.com from making around 5,000 music tracks available on the Internet. [ Read more ]

The Regional court orders Rapidshare to pay a 34 million dollar fine to GEMA, and to start actively filtering and removing the files it hosts for copyrighted content. Initally the case was brought on by copyright protection association GEMA. The court also mentions the precautions allegedly taken by rapidshare and other file hosting website is not sufficient to prevent copyright issues.

"The judgment states that the hosting service itself is now responsible for making sure that none of the music tracks concerned are distributed via its platform in the future. This means that the copyright holder is no longer required to perform the ongoing and complex checks," mentioned in GEMA declaration.

Bobby Chang, COO of RapidShare AG in Cham (Switzerland), is quite certian about this judgement and completely overthrown to higher courts and most likely restrict the judegement made at Regional Court Hamburg. He also explains We do not consider the court’s decision to be a breakthrough. As other proceedings in similar disputes with GEMA have shown, there is considerable disparity amongst the individual courts in some cases. Our experience is that the courts of appeal tend to restrict the scope of the decisions made by the lower courts. For this reason, we think that it would make more sense to work together to provide music fans with the right services at the right price and to open up a new source of income for music-markets on the Internet,”

Now share your thoughts on Hamburg court's judgement.

Subscribe to commentsExpand all commentsRSS Subscribe to comments
Comments (4)

Anonymous
Respond Report this content 0 

By Anonymous5 months ago

wow where would they get their money

myqute
Respond Report this content +1 

By myqute7 months ago

Ooops! Sorry for the duplicate! >,<

Last post by myqute: H1N1 Flu Vaccination Results Tracked in China

myqute
Respond Report this content +1 

By myqute7 months ago

I tried Rapidshare via Ramaraobobby's blog entry and link. The downloads were fast as promised (so no complaints here). What I didn't like was the piracy of so many copyrighted stuff and the fact that trojans may lay hidden in certain files waiting to be downloaded. (My pc got infected with a rootkit through a friend's email, not via Rapidshare.)

While I understand the concerns of music and content owners, I can also understand why Rapidshare says this judgement is unfair to them and "not a breathrough" to them. The judgement may set a record for future judgements to say that search engines (who are not responsible for what being hosted online), are now technically open "to be sued" - just for SHOWING links or extracts of links with pirated music.

What makes it more legally complex is that the music links hosted via Rapishare are not really "free". Most people swear they hate downloading anything from Rapidshare (the only way to download conveniently is to pay). If Rapidshare paid royalties to music owners for the music they hosted, they would not be in legal trouble!

For now, music owners may have peace of mind to know that their music is no longer downloadable via Rapidshare.

Last post by myqute: H1N1 Flu Vaccination Results Tracked in China

kaytiiangel
Respond Report this content +1 

By kaytiiangel7 months ago

Wow! This is great for the music industry. Perfect post mash. Well, done.

Last post by kaytiiangel: I CAN do anything for 21 days, it's just hard