Give Feedback

judge

11 posts

1986: Goldstone sends 13-year old boy to jail for protesting apartheid

World AffairsPolitics & Opinions

3 months ago

And you thought Richard Goldstone was a champion in the fight against apartheid. Well, not always.
In the most poignant case, Goldstone ruled against the 1986 appeal of a 13-year-old boy who had been sentenced to jail for disrupting school as a protest against apartheid and increasingly draconian "emergency laws" used to preserve order and squelch opposition to the government. Goldstone, according to The New York Times, provided no comment to his decision to uphold the sentence of the lower court.

...

The case of the 13-year-old boy Goldstone ruled against came in the context of a wave of national protests and school disruptions by South Africa's black youth against apartheid and the brutal emergency laws. Authorities responded with mass detention of children who participated in the protests, or were suspected of doing so. By the fall of 1985, at least 800 students had been detained. By December of 1986, South African security officials admitted to having detained more than 1,800 teenagers, while reports surfaced that policemen routinely whipped children at their school desks if they were suspected of supporting the anti-apartheid protests.

Continue reading...

Keep Telling Your Story

CounselingSelf Management

5 months ago

Contributed by Irene Watson, MA

One of the most valuable parts of attending an anonymous meeting is sharing your story and listening to other people’s stories.

Many people feel anxious about going to a meeting because they are afraid to tell their story, to let other people know their problems or the mistakes they have made.

The first thing to know is that you don’t have to share anything if you don’t want to. If you do want to share, you share only what you want to. No one will expect you to give any specific information. No one will ask you questions about your issue. This is not an interrogation, a place to judge or to lay blame. It’s simply a place to unburden ourselves when we are ready, and to learn from other people.

When the time in the meeting comes to share, people share if they want to. They generally talk for just a few minutes, respecting others by not using up all the time. They talk about whatever is on their mind, a problem they have, what they are experiencing, how they feel, or how they are working the program. No one interrupts anyone else. The person is allowed to finish, and then the next person who wishes to speak does so.

Meetings do not allow for crosstalk, feedback, or advice giving. If you want someone to give you advice, you can ask that if anyone has advice, they tell you after the meeting, but we do not give advice during the meeting so no one feels they are being told what to do, so people feel it is safe to share.

Continue reading...

Good riddance to bad rubbish!

World AffairsPolitics & Opinions

7 months ago


The title should read “An inmate sentenced to death dies”. End of story right; but as usual nothing is that simple when it comes to the death penalty, the liberal media and Texas.

The truth is that nothing would have changed even if the appeal had been heard. The supreme court case upon which the appeal was predicated was decided in favor of the state. Sorry. All this judge did was save the tax payers of Texas a few additional dollars; they will no longer have to support this raping murderer.

This Michael Richard was sentenced for a crime committed in 1986. I think 21 years of eating, breathing and sleeping at tax payer’s expense is a little extreme. The real issue in this story is that there are inmates sitting on death row for decades. The real travesty is that it takes so damn long to pull the plug on those who have been convicted.

Enjoy the read; this is the article from MSN and the Disassociated Press:

Texas judge in death row appeal faces charges
Continue reading...

You be the judge

LifestyleLove & Relationships

7 months ago



For when you  pass judgement on your fellow man, you condemn yourself; for you who sit in judgement upon others are guilty of the same misdeeds; therefore you are without excuse, o man, whoever you are who judge.

We’re really good at it, aren’t we? Passing judgement on people we don’t know? Even the most self-righteous and church-going and “good” people do it, perhaps unconsciously but we do it.

We pass that lady or that man and make assumptions about them.

I spend quite a lot of time thinking about what other think of me. It’s part of the condition I suffer from: Social phobia. I have pledged to spend 3/4th of my time wondering about YOU and YOUR feelings about ME and MY choices. Not as a favor but as some sort of self punishment I suppose. In all honesty, my mind does realize that you could care less about me. If you’re not closely related to me, why would you care? I do get that. Emotionally I don’t get it.

Continue reading...

Federal Court Rules Against Constitutional Rights

World AffairsPolitics & Opinions

9 months ago

Last week, U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker issued a ruling that strikes at the heart of the Constitution. He dismissed 46 separate law suits that have been filed by consumer groups against the United States’ largest telecommunications firms. The suits were filed because firms such as AT&T assisted the government in the warrantless wiretapping of Americans. By the wording of his ruling, Judge Walker clearly understood that the actions of these companies may have violated the Constitution but indicated that he was powerless to do anything else because Congress passed a law in 2008 which retroactively immunized the telecommunications companies from legal action. The effect of the ruling is a gutting of the Fourth Amendment.
 
The Fourth Amendment is very short and quite clear. It is a part of the Bill of Rights and it reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The warrantless wiretapping program put in place after the attacks of 9/11 were a clear violation of it.
 
Continue reading...

Obama’s racist, liberal Sotomayor, God help us.

World AffairsPolitics & Opinions

9 months ago


From an MSNBC Article (Excerpts in bold):

 

GOP faces delicate task in fighting Latina pick
All-out assault on Sotomayor could alienate Hispanic and women voters

President Obama nominated federal judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court yesterday, putting her in line to become the nation's first Hispanic justice and creating a difficult political equation for Republicans as they weigh how aggressively to fight her appointment.

Let me help the “republicans” along a bit; fight her with every ounce of your being. This choice is one of those moments when the conservatives can set themselves apart from the moderates and give the voters a choice in the next election.

Continue reading...

Tales from the COP side.

World AffairsPolitics & Opinions

11 months ago


Traffic court is usually a snoozer. It always manages to land on my day off and after a midnight shift. I trudge in half asleep and ready to just commit suicide by contempt but there are those gems that make chronic sleep deprivation worth while…

Defenses that didn’t seem to work:

Judge: You are charged with operating a vehicle with improper or unsafe equipment, a blown headlight, how do you plead?

Defendant: Not guilty your honor, I don’t know why the officer wrote me a ticket; he just barely gave me a warning for it a month ago.

Judge: I don’t believe I would have said that; guilty. Doh!

Next…

Judge: You are charged with unlawful speed in a school zone, how do you plead?

Defendant:
Continue reading...