Give Feedback
HomeLaw and SocietyMiddle East

Why American Jews Voted For President Obama

caitlyn

By caitlyn

6 months ago

Read more: politics

RSS Feed

Mark Gold wrote a piece published on the right-wing Israpundit website on August 6th titled "Were Jewish Obama Voters Fooled?". He also submitted the post to The Jerusalem Post blogging contest. I originally wrote a brief comment objecting to his assertions but the more I through about what he wrote the more I realized just how insulted and offended I was by his article. I decided a longer and more forceful response was in order.

The principle assertion made by Mr. Gold is that "Obama’s Jewish voters were not fooled by his campaign, but rather that, unfortunately, Israel is just not a major concern or issue to them." Nothing could be further from the truth.  Mr. Gold also claims that none of his Jewish acquaintances have any regrets about voting for President Obama. Perhaps that is because the Republican alternative still looks, in retrospect, far likely to have done serious harm than the Obama administration, even with its present misguided policies towards Israel.

Mr. Gold's claims that Israel is relatively unimportant to American Jewry or that American Jews continue to blindly support the President and his policies is belied by an article published in The Jerusalem Post on August 12th with the headline "Most US Jewish Obama backers oppose his Israel policies". The article quotes frequent Fox News contributor Dick Morris:

 "Democratic Jews in the United States strongly support Obama, but also strongly support Israel. Asked explicitly to choose between Obama's position and that of the Israeli government on issues such as construction in the settlements, or the two-state solution, they back the Israeli view by more than two to one. To me this indicates that the jury is still out and that a backlash may yet develop against Obama's policies."
Sorry, Mr. Gold, but two to one in support of Israel and opposed to the President's policies vis a vis Israel among Jewish Democrats indicates, to me, that Israel remains a major concern for most of us.

The alternative Mr. Gold presents, that we were "fooled" by the Obama campaign, is also completely wrong. As a religious minority we watched John McCain sell his soul to the religious right of the Republican party. We watched him select Sarah Palin, an incompetent and absolutely unprepared overtly right wing evangelical Christian less than one term governor from Alaska as his choice for Vice President. The prospect of Mrs. Palin a heartbeat away from the Presidency was truly frightening. Jewish Americans who aren't wedded to the Republican Party or the conservative movement still distrust evangelicals with good reason. First, they still seek tirelessly to convert us to Chistianity and strip us of our Jewish religion, traditions, and culture. Second, for many evangelical Christians their "support" for Israel includes a prophetic view of the future in which the Jews either accept Jesus or are slaughtered in a coming apocalypse. Consequently they support the most right wing and intransigent forces in Israel who work against any hope of peace at any time in the future. Sorry, but to most American Jews these people are not our friends and we simply do not trust their motives.

In general we saw a right wing Republican campaign as contrary to the liberal values most American Jews, and indeed the majority of Jews in Israel, share. We saw them, and the prospect of their likely Supreme Court nominations, as a direct threat to our religious freedom in America.

American Jews were faced with a difficult choice. We looked at Barack Obama's record in the U.S. Senate, which was staunchly pro-Israel. We wondered if it was sincere or merely a necessity to be elected Senator from Illinois. We looked at his statements while in the Illinois Senate which also were positive. We heard his campaign statements and we heard reassurances from Joe Biden, whose record of support for Israel is long and impeccable. We watched other pro-Israel Democrats line up behind Obama.

After all that we had our doubts but looking at the choices and the reassurances we made what seemed to be the less onerous choice. I am still not at all sure it was the wrong choice. Last week  I wrote about the power of Democrats who support Israel to influence the President and help to change his policy towards Israel. I will remind my readers once again that both Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush were seen as anti-Israel early in their respective administrations. Early in the Bush administration when Prime Minister Sharon visited the President pro-Israel voices in the press colorfully stated that the Prime Minister had been "bushwhacked." The Prime Minister then famously warned President Bush that Israel is not Czechoslovakia in 1938, to be sacrificed to appease the Arabs. After 9/11 policies changed and Mr. Gold is one of those that still calls Mr. Bush the best friend that Israel has ever had in the White House.

Much as an assessment based on the first six months of the Clinton or Bush administrations would have reached the wrong conclusion about how these Presidents would shape American policy towards Israel, so too might Mr. Gold's assessment of President Obama prove false. The truth is we just don't know yet. I also find it interesting that Mr. Gold is attacking American Jewry for a lack of loyalty to Israel. Didn't Mrs. Palin, a candidate he supported, characterize anyone in areas which weren't support her views as essientially un-American? I wonder how Mr. Gold reconciles that with condemning American Jews for putting American interests first over his notion of Israeli interests. I, for one, don't believe that is the case but that is the assertion Mr. Gold is making.

Simply put, Mr. Gold's article does not pass the smell test. Last week I wrote that Republicans and conservatives who see political gain in discrediting President Obama will always throw proverbial stones regardless of the policy. They will always find fault. It is in their political interest to do so. If we ignored Republican warnings about Mr. Obama during the campaign it was simply because the source of those warnings was not trustworthy. Democrats, liberals, and moderates are not interested in condemning the President. We are more interested in meaningful policy change towards Israel. Mr. Gold, as a conservative Republican, is in no position to castigate and condemn Jewish Democrats when his true agenda has less to do with what is right for Israel than it does with pushing a conservative Republican political agenda, one most American Jews simply do not agree with.

I am an American Jew of Israeli heritage actively planning aliya.  Much of my family lives in Israel.  My love for the State of Israel and support for Israel could not be stronger.   I also love the United States of America and the opportunities this country has given me.   I voted for President Obama.  I am not at all convinced my vote was in error given the alternative.  As such I found Mr. Gold's assertions about Jewish Democrats particularly insulting.

NOTE:  This was originally published in Blogs of Zion.
 

Subscribe to commentsExpand all commentsRSS Subscribe to comments
Comments (11)

TheJackB
Respond Report this content -1 

By TheJackB6 months ago

Palin was a horrific choice for VP. Had McCain made a better selection he would have had an excellent chance at winning the election.

Last post by TheJackB: The First Gray Hair

caitlyn
Respond Report this content -1 

By caitlyn6 months ago

You know, I know a lot of liberals, Jewish and gentile, and none of them has "more compassion for criminals than honest people." If you bothered to read my blog and writings about the Palestinians you'd know that my compassion doesn't extend to terrorists. I will never understand the conservative mentality that sees the need to demonize, mischaracterize, and outright lie about people who disagree with them.

Oh, and American Jews, by and large, didn't vote based on gay marriage or abortion though the vast majority are pro-choice. Polls showed that most of us voted the way we did on economic issues.

Last post by caitlyn: Iran: A Moment Of Truth, CNN Style

Anonymous
Respond Report this content -1 

By Anonymous6 months ago

I will never understand the liberal mentality that shows more compassion for criminals than for honest people. Hamas and Fatah terrorize Arabs to keep them in line while using Jews as scapegoats.

caitlyn
Respond Report this content 0 

By caitlyn6 months ago

Ron Mossad: You are making assumptions not in evidence. Your agenda, to slam a liberal, Democratic President, seems to drive your conclusions. So far all President Obama has done is say the same sort of things Secretary of State Rice said at the behest of President Bush regarding Jerusalem and settlements. He has continued Bush administration policy. I didn't agree with it when Bush was President and I don't agree with it now that Obama is President. Republicans have NOT been great friends of Israel. Remember the first President Bush? He's the one who froze loan guarantees over settlements.

President Obama says the United States has an "unbreakable bond" with Israel and he was willing to say it in the Arab world. Not bad for a guy who supposedly "doesn't like Israel very much."

Again, the last President Bush, seven months into his administration, seemed far worse vis a vis Israel than President Obama does now.

Last post by caitlyn: Iran: A Moment Of Truth, CNN Style

ronmossad
Respond Report this content -1 

By ronmossad6 months ago

That's exactly right Ben. And in the end, it doesn't really matter why or how or who or what. They voted for a guy who just does not like Israel very much. Many of us warned this would happen, we were ignored and now they want to justify their vote by saying "oh no no it's not fair, you guys are just right-wing nutjobs why should we have believed you!"

Last post by ronmossad: Goodbye to the "Decade From Hell" and good riddance

BenK
Respond Report this content +1 

By BenK6 months ago

I think it is never smart to blanketly categorize all voters of any candidate in any particular way. What is more reasonable is to 'contemplate' why a good number of such voters might have been the way they were.
I appreciate that to many US Jews they agree with the Democratic social agenda, freedom of abortion and its encouragement to youth, gay marriage, and a maximum fleeing from anything religous heard from members of the government.
I appreciate the concern that many are commited to the hope that Jews would become Christians as part of their religous fervor and that a certain amount are clearly Republican.
I happen to be a religous Jew myself so regarding free for all abortion and traditional family life I frankly identify more with the Republican side, and I do not tremble as strongly from 'all' things smelling of religoun heard from a government.
I guess whats true is for Jews the far right and far left are troublesome.
But fact of the matter is Obama and his admin have publicly rebuked and pressured Israel frequently over Jewish housing in East Jerusalem and elsewhere while Hamas is in control of Gaza and Fatah proclaim the "armed struggle" is a legitamte option.
Futhermore Obama publicly annuls a Publicly Transfered letter by a US President (Bush) to ISraeli PM Sharon on settlements and other things. The strong pressure also on East Jerusalem reasonably makes us concerned

the Expulsion of 300,000 Jews from their homes,
the entry of all Israel into Palestinian rocket range, and
loss of access to the most holy Jewish sites is on the horizon.

No Commited Jews can be SILENT when ALL these are on ther line. Period.

Last post by BenK: Why Is Obama Admin SILENT On Palestinian Uncompromising Unacceptable Demands?!

ronmossad
Respond Report this content -1 

By ronmossad6 months ago

How do you figure those are "partisan" sources? The first link was my own blog which was me commenting on a Shmuel Rosner article SUPPORTING Obama.

The second was a panel of pro-Israel people...not evil Republicans, just pro-Israel people like you and me.

The third one was yes, extremely partisan and anti-Israel...and PRO-OBAMA.

You cannot simply discount that these are "partisan" statements. I'm not linking you to Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh. I'm linking you people who were concerned about Obama's actions (on BOTH SIDES of the Israel issue by the way) before he was even nominated to run.

There were those of us who saw this information and took it seriously. And those of us who did not. As of right now it appears that those of us that did were right and those of us that didn't, were either tricked or didn't care enough to vote on their feelings.

Your comparison to Bush's first six months are also not accurate.

Bush did not give a massive speech to the Islamic world where he implied that America had wronged the Muslims. He also did not make a correlation between Palestinian suffering and the civil rights movement or the Holocaust.

The world was a very different place in August of 2000 as compared to August of 2009. There was no 2nd intifada in Israel and there was no 9/11. We hadn't given the Palestinians in a de facto state in Gaza yet and seen it literally blow up in our faces.

For all of Sharon's bluster about not being Czechoslovakia - he was in the end, wrong about Bush. Bush gave Israel unbelievable support, much more so than Clinton, a perceived-darling for American Jews, did.

I'm sorry that you think now, in hindsight, that Clinton was a friend of Israel. Clinton pushed us into this awful Oslo agreement to begin with. Clinton may have THOUGHT he was doing the right thing and so might Obama.

But he didn't.

And neither is Obama.

Last post by ronmossad: Goodbye to the "Decade From Hell" and good riddance

caitlyn
Respond Report this content -1 

By caitlyn6 months ago

I will remind you of how two other Presidents were seen six months into their respective administrations:

George W. Bush was also putting undo pressure on Israel and getting cozy with the Arabs. It was so bad Prime Minister Sharon warned the President that Israel was not Czechoslovakia in 1938. The press said that Sharon had been "bushwhacked" when he visited President Bush for the first time. Then events changed the Bush administration policy, primarily 9/11.

Bill Clinton also had rocky relations with Prime Minister Netanyahu at first. He negotiated the Wye River Accords and when the Oslo process ultimately failed he placed the blame squarely where it belonged: on Yasser Arafat and the Palestinians. Most would now agree that Clinton proved to be a friend of Israel.

You cannot know how things will turn out with President Obama six months into his administration. You have, based largely on partisan sources, made judgments which, G-d willing, are premature. Democrats in both the House and Senate have been urging the President to change course. I think ultimately it may be events, the lack of reciprocity by the Arabs, that may convince the President that he, like his predecessors, made some serious misjudgments about Middle East policy.

Only time will tell.

Last post by caitlyn: Iran: A Moment Of Truth, CNN Style

ronmossad
Respond Report this content +1 

By ronmossad6 months ago

A lot of people don't think they're putting their family in danger even though they inevitably do. You know, the road to hell is paved...and all that.

I never said that my vote was strictly pro-Israel. This isn't a "pro-Israel" contest. It is however, a right and wrong contest. You say the sources were "unreliable" - I'll tell you what did it for me. It was very early on in the process when Obama was still a huge longshot. I read an article by Shmuel Rosner about Obama's stance on Israel and it was very disturbing to me.

http://ronmossad.blogspot.com/2007/12/shmuel-rosner-likes-obamaronmossad-not.html

Please note that the "Israel panel" had an initial negative reaction to Obama - ranking him far below McCain and Giuliani. These aren't rumor-mongers, the people on that panel were well-known, serious people.

Here's more from the Israel panel:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=960851

Please note Obama's final score was a 5.12 whereas McCain's was 7.75. Biden's by the way was a 5.62.

Out of 26 contenders ranked, Obama was 6th from the bottom. 20th from the top. DISMAL.

Then I came across this article from "Electronic Intifada":

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article6619.shtml

The last time I spoke to Obama was in the winter of 2004 at a gathering in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood.

He responded warmly, and volunteered, "Hey, I'm sorry I haven't said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I'm hoping when things calm down I can be more up front." He referred to my activism, including columns I was contributing to the The Chicago Tribune critical of Israeli and US policy, "Keep up the good work!"

Then came all the creeps he surrounded himself with during the campaign.

Photographs of him with Edward Said and his time with Jeremiah Wright only added to the disturbing pattern.

Last post by ronmossad: Goodbye to the "Decade From Hell" and good riddance

caitlyn
Respond Report this content 0 

By caitlyn6 months ago

Oh, nonsense! I don't believe random claims made on the internet. Those were not reliable sources. I acted on my concerns and, in all honesty, I still don't believe McCain would have been good for Israel, albeit for entirely different reasons than Obama. I didn't vote for anything nebulous. I voted based on the records of the two candidates and their running mates.

Israel is a litmus test issue for me when I vote. I voted for Ronald Reagen in 1984 even though I knew he was a terrible President. Why? I felt Mondale was (and is) an Arabist who would be as bad or worse than Carter was. When it came to then Senator Obama, after much reflection, I decided that he passed that test. Only then could I consider other interests.

Did it ever occur to you that Obama's energy policy and environmental policy is aimed at ending the American dependence on foreign oil and ending the huge transfer of wealth to nations like Iran and Saudi Arabia? It would be good for Israel, would it not, if those nations could no longer spend billions to support groups like Hamas?

You, yourself, admit that a big part of your vote had to do with President Obama's domestic policies which you don't support. How is your vote strictly pro-Israel. It isn't and neither is mine.

Do you really think I would vote to put my own family in danger? You hard right ideologues just can't see past your agenda, can you?

Last post by caitlyn: Iran: A Moment Of Truth, CNN Style

ronmossad
Respond Report this content +1 

By ronmossad6 months ago

"Sorry, Mr. Gold, but two to one in support of Israel and opposed to the President's policies vis a vis Israel among Jewish Democrats indicates, to me, that Israel remains a major concern for most of us."

So let me get this straight - Israel is a major concern for you because you SAY it is, but when it came time to vote, your priorities were some nebulous "hope and change" platform that ended up meaning -hope- for the Palestinians and -change- in support for Israel.

The bottom line is that as an American, you decided that you needed to vote for what you felt was the best candidate for America, not Israel. And that's your prerogative and your right (and maybe your duty as a citizen) to do so.

But you cannot say that Israel was the most important thing to you. I voted for McCain because, in addition to the fact that I didn't like any of Obama's domestic platforms I was very concerned with his apparent choices for cabinet positions and his disturbing comments about Israel. I was concerned by his apparent support for Palestinians like Edward Said and claims on the internet about him telling Palestinians that he just needed to moderate for the election and could go back to supporting them after he won.

I told my Jewish friends about this and they said I was crazy. That it was just rumors and "Republican propaganda" and "fear mongering".

They don't tell me these things anymore...

At the end of the day, you can say you're concerned about something. You can act concerned about something. You can state that something is important to you. But voicing concern is not anywhere NEAR the same as ACTING on your concern.

Last post by ronmossad: Goodbye to the "Decade From Hell" and good riddance