Anyone who reads this blog knows that I love the President as much if not more than the next guy but what the hell was the Nobel Prize committee thinking?
First, and I'm sure many will not agree with me, when your country is at war with two other countries, that should immediately disqualify you for the Nobel Peace Prize. I don't care how righteous the wars are, that's a show-stopper in my book.
Second, the Obama presidency is a work in progress. Many readers of this blog have pounded me for not challenging every single one of their criticisms about Obama. I am in wait and see mode. To say that Obama is a failure nine months into his presidency is absurd. To say we haven't seen many tangible fruits of his labor yet is not so absurd.
The prize committee cited Obama's outreach, particularly to the Muslim world as a deciding factor. Outreach is only an achievement if it changes hearts and minds. Judging from the continued violence being perpetrated in Muslim countries, that change has not occurred yet.
These observations are not a condemnation of Obama. Change takes time. The Nobel committee was simply premature in a big way.
Obama is no fool. He is well aware that he is considered an empty suit by his harshest critics. As a result, when he got the news I have no doubt his first thought was "oh great, I need this like a case of H1N1 right now." His "acceptance speech" given at the White House moments ago reflects this.