Give Feedback
This is America, and we aren't supposed to hate anyone because they are a minority, are we? Actually, we have been getting better lately with regard to many minorities - but not all. Electing Barack Obama President of our United States is evidence that being black has become a respectable distinction for a significant majority of Americans. 8% of the Members of Congress are Black compared with 13% of the population - getting closer. Having one woman as a vice-presidential candidate and another as a serious presidential contender affirms that being a woman is also considered acceptable, even though only 16% of Congress is female.

Being Hispanic is fairly well accepted with 5% of Congress representing 15% of the population. Being Jewish has actually become distinguished, as 7% of Congress represents the 1% of the population who are Jewish. A Gallup Poll reports that only 4% of Americans have a negative view of Jews compared with 23% who have a negative view of Evangelical Christians.

Are Gays the most despised minority? Their situation is still grim, but it isn't the worst. Because many gays, lesbians, and bisexuals fear divulging their status, various studies indicate that anywhere from 4% to 15% of Americans are LGBT. Three members of Congress are openly gay. That is a vast under-representation, even though more Representatives may not yet have declared themselves.

So who is most despised? One strong candidate for the title "Most Despised Minority in America" is Atheists, Agnostics, Humanists, and the others who comprise the group unfortunately termed "non-believers." While "non-believer," in this case, refers to a "non-belief" in a super-human deity, it, like other negative terms, automatically carries a stigma, as would "non-white," "non-male," or "non-Christian."

How many "non-believers" are there in America? This question is even harder to answer than how many Gays, because it appears to be socially unacceptable to state that one is an Atheist or Agnostic. Though the estimates vary widely, 10-12% of all Americans and 20-25% of those aged 18-30 identify themselves as "non-believers," depending very heavily on how the question is phrased. When the poll offers three choices, belief in "God," belief in "universal spirit," or belief in neither, the number who don't believe in "God" jumps to over 20%. 20% of Americans is a huge number to be despised. For comparison, the US Census reports that only 13% of Americans are Black, and only 15% Hispanic.

As evidence of the prejudice against freethinkers ("non-believers"), a poll indicates that only 14% believe that America would accept an Atheist President, while 84% believe we would not. There is only one member of Congress, Representative Pete Stark of California, who openly acknowledges not believing in "God." This is not a lot of representation for 10-20% of our population. How many members of Congress are "closet non-believers?" Who knows. Pete Stark has represented a district near San Francisco since 1973, but only in 2007 announced his non-belief. Would others make similar announcements if doing so were not political suicide? One group suggests that 21 members of congress are closet non-theists.

Freethinkers tend to keep a low profile and not join with others who share similar beliefs partly because they are independent-minded people, and partly out of fear of reprisal for openly acknowledging their belief system. The Freedom From Religion Foundation, the largest association of freethinkers (atheists and agnostics) in the United States, is one of very few that actively work to protect the rights of freethinkers. One of the projects of FFRF is documenting a few of the widespread hateful deeds and words against freethinkers, such as comparing non-belief in a super-human deity to Nazi war crimes or the activities of the Ku Klux Klan or Al-Qaeda.

As more evidence of prejudice, the response when the group tries to display a billboard with the simple message, "Imagine No Religion," is outrage. Billboard companies refuse to rent space, and religious extremists respond with vicious baseless propaganda such as, "Why Do Atheists Hate America?"

Where do we go from here? How long will it be before every American has access to their full rights of citizenship, including free speech, separation of church and state, and proportionate representation?




Visit The Complete Cynic's Guide to Politics for more ultra-progressive views on government and life.
Brighten your mornings with my Daily Inspiration - Daily Quote blog.
Today, I dance lightly with life
 - jonathan lockwood huie

Subscribe to commentsExpand all commentsRSS Subscribe to comments
Comments (6)

Anomaly
Respond Report this content 0 

By Anomaly9 months ago

Part Two - The rest of the story

As long as people continue to divide and separate people, we will never have the opportunity to become a blind society. If I saw a cross, a crescent and a menorah in a park along side of a christmas tree even, I consider it a celebration of diversity and not oppression.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" If someone's faith is so lacking as to be threatened by the mere presence of something symbolic of a religion that is not the basis for restricting the rights to freely express their faith. What is happening is an active oppression of the rights of people because of a lack of belief by others.

I have a legal right pray as my faith compels me. You have a right to ignore me or to be offended by my actions but no right to force me not to pray simply because you do not agree. The partisan bickering that is taking place seeks to grant special rights to people based on faith, color and even creed in some instances ... often at the expense of the freedom and liberty of those who do not agree with them.

As for the supposed wall of separation, please show me where that appears in the Constitution and I will come all the way from my third-world country expatriate home (where I am a minority in more ways than one ... and gasp ... do volunteer work to help people who want to improve their lives despite their differences and not revel and remain in the poverty that their situation has brought them up in) to the American city of your choice, give you time to draw a crowd and bow down before you to beg your forgiveness. (I will give you a hint. It is NOT in the Constitution and only appears in a letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptist convention) As such, how does this letter to a group of believers somehow over-rule the Constitution of these independent but united States of America which is legally speaking,

Last post by Anomaly: A Governmental Conundrum

Anomaly
Respond Report this content 0 

By Anomaly9 months ago

It is interesting to me that you complain about the existence or prejudices in society while you are the one classifying these people according to race. Having grown up in West Virginia I do know that it exists and like you I despise it but the difference is that I do not care what color my Congressperson is. I do not care what color my friends are or what their sexual orientation us. Why is it okay to have a Hispanic Caucus or a Black Caucus and not a Caucasian Caucus in Congress? Wouldn't this be further glorifying (and thus widening) the divide between races rather than simply have Congressional Representatives of all ilk?

Political parties serve a purpose (Or at least used to when there was actually political differences and not just partisan-non-political ideology) and are used to provide a system of checks and balances. Dividing people according to race or any other criteria is still a division of the people and serves no useful purpose. Wouldn't it be a truly wonderful world if we could live in Martin Luther King's world where we were judged by the content of our character and not by the color of our skin?

Sorry, had to continue in part two :">

Last post by Anomaly: A Governmental Conundrum

vlu77
Respond Report this content 0 

By vlu7710 months ago

I am a "non believer" in that I don't believe in the personification of God, though it's pretty clear to me there is a higher power than us in the Universe. However, I'm not sure comparing the free thinkers' plight with that of African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans and Gays is entirely fair. I come from a long line of atheists and agnostics and maybe once or twice in our collective lives had we had to deal with anything negative above simple snobbery. Sure, there was a time when non believers were persecuted, but there was a time when Christians were too, as well as Jews, Muslims, Buddists, Hindus, Taoists. Every belief (or lack thereof) group has been persecuted at one point or another and I'd hardly go so far as to say the free thinkers had it worse. I don't remember a time in history when were led, en masse, to our deaths in gas chambers, or slaughtered in great numbers at the hands of a communist government.

This post is irresponsible and insensitive and quite frankly, demonstrates the attitude that keeps believers from really respecting us.

Jonathan
Respond Report this content 0 

By Jonathan10 months ago

To anonymous, Your experience in comparing religions is admirable, but not typical. In a Gallup poll on why Americans attend church, 25% responded that the primary reason they attended was because they were brought up that way, or because their family or friends did, as opposed to because of religious conviction. One wonders how many of those who reported religious conviction at their primary reason were merely saying what they believe is expected of them.

Last post by Jonathan: Life is no brief candle to me - George Bernard Shaw

Anonymous
Respond Report this content +1 

By Anonymous10 months ago

Perhaps some of this prejudice against "non-believers" comes from their use of the term "freethinkers" to distinguish themselves from "believers". Implicit in such a distinguishment is the suggesti...

jusezlovesme
Respond Report this content +1 

By jusezlovesme10 months ago

I confirm the prejudice exist although not very obvious. Was told it's so in almost all countries although not always spoken about as often as in the States. Expats, natives and settlers get compared all the time. For jobs, status, invitations, etc